Assessment of Flow Fluctuation Pressure Models for Simulating the Cavitating Flow
Le A. D. 1, Ngoc L. L.1, Viet A. T.2, Tran H. T.3
1University of Engineering and Technology, Vietnam National University, Hanoi, Vietnam
2Hanoi University of Science and Technology, Hanoi, Vietnam
3Faculty of Aerospace Engineering, Le Quy Don Technical University, Hanoi, Vietnam
Email: anh.ld@vnu.edu.vn

PDF
A numerical study is performed to simulate the cavitating flow, evaluating the applicability of different flow fluctuation pressure (FFP) models such as the Singhai FFT model, the modified Singhal FFT model, the shear strain model, and the present shear strain-vorticity model. The axisymmetric blunt-body with the availability of experimental data is selected for the simulation purpose. According to the results, the first three FFP models produce nearly similar pressure coefficient Cp distribution on the blunt-body. On the other hand, the numerical results indicate the influence of both turbulent shear strain rate and the vorticity in the flow. A slightly better prediction of the cavitation mechanisms such as the flow parameter Cp and cavity length is thus produced with the present shear strain-vorticity model. Keywords: Cavitation, turbulent fluctuation, shear strain, voticity, homogeneous model.
  1. U. Iben, A.V. Makhnov, A.A. Schmidt, Tech. Phys. Lett., 45 (1), 41 (2019). DOI: 10.1134/S1063785019010255
  2. D.L. Anh, J. Okajima, Y. Iga, J. Fluids Eng., 141 (8), 081102 (2019). DOI: 10.1115/1.4042257
  3. D.L. Anh, J. Okajima, Y. Iga, Cryogenics, 101, 29 (2019). DOI: 10.1016/j.cryogenics.2019.04.010
  4. D.L. Anh, P.T. Hoang, T.T. Hung, J. Fluids Eng., 143 (10), 101204 (2021). DOI: 10.1115/1.4051078
  5. D.L. Anh, J. Fluids Eng., 144 (1), 011206 (2022). DOI: 10.1115/1.4051972
  6. A.D. Le, H.T. Tran, J. Appl. Fluid Mech., 15 (2), 551 (2022). DOI: 10.47176/JAFM.15.02.33231
  7. A.K. Singhal, M.M. Athavale, H. Li, Y. Jiang, J. Fluids Eng., 124 (3), 617 (2002). DOI: 10.1115/1.1486223
  8. G.H. Schnerr, J. Sauer, in 4th Int. Conf. on multiphase flow (New Orleans, USA, 2001)
  9. P.J. Zwart, A.G. Gerber, T. Belamri, in 5th Int. Conf. on multiphase flow (Yokohama, Japan, 2004), N 152
  10. R. Chebli, B. Audebert, G. Zhang, O. Coutier-Delgosha, Comput. Fluids, 221, 104898 (2021). DOI: 10.1016/j.compfluid.2021.104898
  11. F.R. Menter, NASA Technical Memorandum 103975 (NASA, 1992)
  12. Y. Saito, R. Takami, I. Nakamori, T. Ikohagi, Comput. Mech., 40 (1), 85 (2007). DOI: 10.1007/s00466-006-0086-1
  13. A. Asnaghi, A. Feymark, R.E. Bensow, Int. J. Multiphase Flow, 93, 142 (2017). DOI: 10.1016/j.ijmultiphaseflow.2017.04.005
  14. H. Rouse, J.S. Mc Nown, Cavitation and pressure distribution: head forms at zero angle of yaw (State University of Iowa, 1948)

Подсчитывается количество просмотров абстрактов ("html" на диаграммах) и полных версий статей ("pdf"). Просмотры с одинаковых IP-адресов засчитываются, если происходят с интервалом не менее 2-х часов.

Дата начала обработки статистических данных - 27 января 2016 г.

Publisher:

Ioffe Institute

Institute Officers:

Director: Sergei V. Ivanov

Contact us:

26 Polytekhnicheskaya, Saint Petersburg 194021, Russian Federation
Fax: +7 (812) 297 1017
Phone: +7 (812) 297 2245
E-mail: post@mail.ioffe.ru