Volumes and Issues
Home » Optics and Spectroscopy » Year 2024, issue 8 » Article p. 756
<<<>>>
Zero-, one-, and two-dimensional modes in the Lugiato--Lefever model with focused pumps: A brief review
Russian version
Malomed B. A.1
1Department of Physical Electronics, School of Electrical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, and the Center for Light-Matter University, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
Email: malomed@tauex.tau.ac.il
PDF
A review is presented for theoretical results demonstrating the creation of stable spatially confined 0D (zero-dimensional), 1D, and 2D modes in the framework of the Lugiato-Lefever (LL) equations, which are fundamental models of externally driven nonlinear passive optical cavities. The confinement is imposed, in the 2D setting, by the tight harmonic-oscillator (HO) potential, or, in the framework of the 1D and 2D LL equations, by the tightly focused 1D or 2D pump term. The 2D modes, which are strongly confined by the HO potential, and driven by the zero-vorticity or vortical pump, realize effectively 0D pixels, with the respective vorticity. These solutions are obtained by means of the perturbation theory (in the 1D case), variational approximation (VA) and Thomas-Fermi approximation, as well as in the numerical form. The 1D LL equation with the tightly focused pump, which is approximated by the delta-function, gives rise to an exact solution of the codimension-one (non-generic) type, provided that the equation includes a cubic loss term, along with the linear one. In addition to the codimension-one analytical solution, generic ones are obtained in the numerical form, featuring shapes which are close to those of the analytical solution. These 1D modes are completely stable. The 2D LL equation including the focused pump with vorticity S=0,1,2,..., produces pump-pinned modes, that are found by means of VA and numerically. Stability regions are identified for these modes in the system's parameter space. Under the action of the self-focusing cubic nonlinearity, those vortex modes which are unstable spontaneously transform into necklace-shaped states. On the other hand, the defocusing nonlinearity maintains stability of the vortex modes, at least, up to S=5. Keywords: laser cavity; focused pump; localized modes; vortices; stability; variational approximation; Thomas-Fermi approximation; perturbation theory.
  1. L.A. Lugiato, R. Lefever. Phys. Rev. Lett., 58, 2209-2211 (1987)
  2. G.J. de Valcarcel, K. Staliunas. Phys. Rev. A, 87, 043802 (2013)
  3. H. Taheri, A.A. Eftekhar, K. Wiesenfeld, A. Adibi. IEEE Photonics J., 7, 2200309 (2015)
  4. M. Karpov, H. Guo, A. Kordts, V. Brasch, M.H. Pfeiffer, M. Zervas, M. Geiselmann, T.J. Kippenberg. Phys. Rev. Lett., 116, 103902 (2016)
  5. P. Parra-Rivas, D. Gomila, P. Colet, L. Gelens. Eur. Phys. J. D, 71, 198 (2017)
  6. X. Dong, C. Spiess, V.G. Bucklew, W.H. Renninger. Phys. Rev. Res., 3, 033252 (2021)
  7. M.G. Clerc, M.A. Ferre, S. Coulibaly, R.G. Rojas, M. Tlidi. Opt. Lett., 42, 2906-2909 (2017)
  8. B. Garbin, Y. Wang, S.G. Murdoch, G.-L. Oppo, S. Coen, M. Erkintalo. Eur. Phys. J. D, 71, 240 (2017)
  9. Y.-Y. Wang, M.-M. Li, G.-Q. Zhou, Y. Fan, X.-J. Lai. Eur. Phys. J. Plus., 134, 161 (2019)
  10. Q.-H. Cao, K.-L. Geng, B.-W. Zhu, Y.-Y. Wang, C.-Q. Dai. Chaos Sol. \& Fract., 166, 112895 (2023)
  11. S. Coen, H.G. Randle, T. Sylvestre, M. Erkintalo. Opt. Lett., 38, 37-39 (2013)
  12. Y.K. Chembo, C.R. Menyuk. Phys. Rev. A, 87, 053852 (2013)
  13. M.R.E. Lamont, Y. Okawachi, A.L. Gaeta. Opt. Lett., 38, 3478-3481 (2013)
  14. C. Godey, I.V. Balakireva, A. Coillet, Y.K. Chembo. Phys. Rev. A, 89, 063814 (2014)
  15. V.E. Lobanov, G. Lihachev, T.J. Kippenberg, M.L. Gorodetsky. Opt. Exp., 23, 7713-7721 (2015)
  16. Q. Li, T.C. Briles, D.A. Westly, T.E. Drake, J.R. Stone, B.R. Ilic, S.A. Diddams, S.B. Papp, K. Srinivasan. Optica, 4, 193--203 (2017)
  17. Y.V. Kartashov, O. Alexander, D.V. Skryabin. Opt. Express, 25, 11550-11555 (2017)
  18. L.A. Lugiato, F. Prati, M.L. Gorodetsky, T. Kippenberg. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. A, 376, 20180113 (2018)
  19. A. Coillet, I. Balakireva, R. Henriet, K. Saleh, L. Larger, J.M. Dudley, C.R. Menyuk, Y.M. Chembo. IEEE Photonics J., 5, 6100409 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1109/JPHOT.2013.2277882
  20. F. Copie, M. Conforti, A. Kudlinski, A. Mussot, S. Trillo. Phys. Rev. Lett., 116, 143901 (2016)
  21. S.-W. Huang, J. Yang, S.-H. Yang, M. Yu, D.-L. Kwong, T. Zelevinsky, M. Jarrahi, C.W. Wong. Phys. Rev. X, 7, 041002 (2017)
  22. M. Tlidi, K. Panajotov. Chaos, 27, 013119 (2017)
  23. K. Panajotov, M.G. Clerc, M. Tlidi. Eur. Phys. J. D, 71, 176 (2017)
  24. M. Tlidi, M. Taki. Adv. Opt. Photonics, 14, 87-147 (2022)
  25. Y. Sun, P. Parra-Rivas, F. Mangini, S. Wabnitz. Chaos, Solitons \& Fractals, 183, 114870 (2024)
  26. T. Hansson, S. Wabnitz. Nanophotonics, 5, 231-243 (2016)
  27. P. Parra-Rivas, E. Knobloch, L. Gelens, D. Gomila. IMA J. Appl. Math., 86, 856-895 (2021)
  28. W.B. Cardoso, L. Salasnich, B.A. Malomed. Eur. Phys. J. D, 71, 112 (2017)
  29. W.B. Cardoso, L. Salasnich, B.A. Malomed. Sci. Rep., 7, 16876 (2017)
  30. S. He, B.A. Malomed, D. Mihalache, X. Peng, Y. He, D. Deng. Chaos, Solitons \& Fractals, 173, 113737 (2023)
  31. S. Kumar, W.B. Cardoso, B.A. Malomed. Symmetry, 16, 470 (2024)
  32. B.A. Malomed. Prog. Opt., 43, 71-193 (2002)
  33. K.Y. Bliokh, A.Y. Bekshaev, F. Nori. New J. Phys., 15, 033026 (2013)
  34. R.K. Bullough, A.P. Fordy, S.V. Manakov. Phys. Lett. A, 91, 98-100 (1982)
  35. A.B. Matsko, L. Maleki. Opt. Exp., 21, 28862-28867 (2013)
  36. N. Laskin. Phys. Lett. A, 268, 298-305 (2000)
  37. N. Laskin. Fractional Quantum Mechanics (World Scientific, Singapore, 2018)
  38. B. Mandelbrot. The Fractal Geometry of Nature (W.H. Freeman, New York, 1982)
  39. M. Brambilla, L.A. Lugiato, F. Prati, L. Spinelli, W.J. Firth. Phys. Rev. Lett., 79, 2042 (1997)
  40. S. Barland, J.R. Tredicce, M. Brambilla, L.A. Lugiato, S. Balle, M. Giudici, T. Maggipinto, L. Spinelli, G. Tissoni, T. Knödl, M. Miller, R. Jager. Nature, 419, 699-702 (2002)
  41. M. Cai, C.P. Li. Fractional Calculus Appl. Anal., 305, 287-301 (2019)
  42. L.P. Pitaevskii, S. Stringari. Bose-Einstein Condensation (Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2003)
  43. A.L. Fetter. Rev. Mod. Phys., 81, 647 (2009)
  44. M.L. Chiofalo, S. Succi, M.P. Tosi. Phys. Rev. E, 62, 7438 (2000)
  45. W.Z. Bao, Q. Du. SIAM J. Sci. Comp., 25, 1674-1697 (2004)
  46. J. Yang. Nonlinear waves in integrable and nonintegrable systems (SIAM, Philadelphia, 2010)
  47. D. Mihalache, D. Mazilu, B.A. Malomed, F. Lederer. Phys. Rev. A, 73, 043615 (2006)
  48. L. Berge. Phys. Rep., 303, 259 (1998)
  49. G. Fibich. The Nonlinear Schrödinger Equation: Singular Solutions and Optical Collapse (Springer: Heidelberg, 2015)
  50. T. Bohr, G. Huber, E. Ott. Physica D, 106, 95 (1997)
  51. M. Gabbay, E. Ott, P.N. Guzdar. Physica D., 118, 371 (1998)
  52. L.-C. Crasovan, B.A. Malomed, D. Mihalache. Phys. Rev. E, 63, 016605 (2001)
  53. J. Atai, Y.J. Chen, J.M. Soto-Crespo. Phys. Rev. A, 49, R3170-R3173 (1994)
  54. A. Dubietis, G. Tamosauskas, G. Fibich, B. Ilan. Opt. Lett., 29, 1126-1128 (2004)
  55. P. Parra-Rivas, D. Gomila, M.A. Matias, S. Coen, L. Gelens. Phys. Rev. A, 89, 043813 (2014)
  56. V.E. Zakharov, S.V. Manakov, S.P. Novikov, L.P. Pitaevskii. Solitons: the Inverse Scattering Method (Springer, 1984)
  57. C.-K. Lam, B.A. Malomed, K.W. Chow, P. Wai. European Phys. J. Special Topics, 173, 233-243 (2009)
  58. A.S. Reyna, C.B. de Araujo. Adv. Opt. Phot. 9, 720-774 (2017).

Подсчитывается количество просмотров абстрактов ("html" на диаграммах) и полных версий статей ("pdf"). Просмотры с одинаковых IP-адресов засчитываются, если происходят с интервалом не менее 2-х часов.

Дата начала обработки статистических данных - 27 января 2016 г.

Publisher:

Ioffe Institute

Institute Officers:

Director: Sergei V. Ivanov

Contact us:

26 Polytekhnicheskaya, Saint Petersburg 194021, Russian Federation
Fax: +7 (812) 297 1017
Phone: +7 (812) 297 2245
E-mail: post@mail.ioffe.ru